AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 1130.6x more texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19324 vs 10966
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19324 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3343
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3343
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 vs 6 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 429.30 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3840 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- 886.9x better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 345 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 6x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 345 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3343 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10120 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 10 | GP102 |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 | 6 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $1,199 |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 219 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $1,200 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 13.7 TFLOPs | 12,150 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 107.30 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 429.30 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 345 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 282 mm | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 1000 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 11408 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |