NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 345 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 19324
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 19324
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 7 August 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 345 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 19324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 19324 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3652
- 58x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 58
- 58x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 429.30 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10821 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 19324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 19324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3362 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 7 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 213 | 216 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1677 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1406 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | 840 GFLOPs |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | 26.7 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | 13.4 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 107.30 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 429.30 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 345 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 13.7 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 282 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 1000 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |