AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1156 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1247 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 11.1x more texture fill rate: 319.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 170.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 24
- 22.2x better floating-point performance: 10,215 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
Launch date | 1 October 2017 vs 1 September 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1156 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1247 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 319.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 10,215 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 1 October 2017 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1240 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1247 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1156 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10,215 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 319.2 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |