AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 1156 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1247 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 85.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 48
| Launch date | 1 October 2017 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1156 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1247 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 48 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7360 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Launch date | 1 October 2017 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1058 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1247 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1156 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 10,215 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 319.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Length | 152 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | DDR3 / DDR4 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano with others
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655
