AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1247 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1546 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • 6685.8x more texture fill rate: 395.80 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 8192 vs 1024
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 vs 70535
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 vs 6316
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 vs 6316
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 August 2017 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed 1247 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1546 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate 395.80 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 8192 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 204168 vs 70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14744 vs 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14744 vs 6316

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

  • 149.1x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs
  • Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 295 Watt
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1890 MHz
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3717
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3358
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3717
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3358
Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance 1,894 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 295 Watt
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8390 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 27566 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8390 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 27566 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
204168
70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14744
6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14744
6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
27566
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark 14393
PassMark - G2D Mark 800
Geekbench - OpenCL 204168 70535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 195.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2129.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 129.271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1328.033
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14744 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14744 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 27566
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7522

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Vega 10 Pitcairn
Design Radeon RX Vega Series
Launch date 7 August 2017 13 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $499
Place in performance rating 170 165
Price now $449.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 41.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1546 MHz 925 MHz
Compute units 64
Core clock speed 1247 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 12.7 TFLOPs 1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 840 GFLOPs
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 26.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 13.4 TFLOPs
Pipelines 8192 1024
Pixel fill rate 98.90 GP/s
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 4096
Texture fill rate 395.80 GTexel/s 59.2 GTexel / s
Texture Units 256
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 295 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 12,500 million 2,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 279 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB/s 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1890 MHz 4800 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
ZeroCore