AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1053 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3157 vs 2086
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3157 vs 2086
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 1 March 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1053 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 vs 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 vs 2086 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- Around 68% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 392
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2659 vs 1494
- 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 8941
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3359
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 vs 392 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2659 vs 1494 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 8941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 392 | 410 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1494 | 2659 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | 51217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Vega | Baffin |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 1 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 663 | 664 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1053 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1002 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 1,887 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 58.97 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,500 million | 3,000 million |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 112.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |