AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 M330

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

AMD Radeon R5 M330

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
Around 71% better floating-point performance: 1,126 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 18 Watt
2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1527 vs 596
Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8941 vs 5874
Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3157 vs 1850
Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3157 vs 1850
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2691
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2691

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 November 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Texture fill rate	35.2 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 320
Floating-point performance	1,126 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 18 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1527 vs 596
Geekbench - OpenCL	8941 vs 5874
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3157 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3157 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 2691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 2691

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330

3.2x more core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 300 MHz
16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 399

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	955 MHz vs 300 MHz
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	519 vs 399

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

399

519

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1527

596

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8941

5874

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3157

1850

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3157

1850

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

2691

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

2691

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile	AMD Radeon R5 M330
PassMark - G2D Mark	399	519
PassMark - G3D Mark	1527	596
Geekbench - OpenCL	8941	5874
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3157	1850
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3157	1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	2691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	2691
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		69.096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1155

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile	AMD Radeon R5 M330
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Vega	Exo
Launch date	24 November 2017	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	665	926
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1030 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	955 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,126 gflops	659.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	320
Texture fill rate	35.2 GTexel / s	20.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	18 Watt
Transistor count	4,500 million	1,040 million
Compute units		5
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	DDR4	DDR3
Shared memory		0
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		No outputs
API support
DirectX		12
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
OpenGL		4.4
Vulkan
Technologies
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore