AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 7.7x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 25.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 20
- 24.5x better floating-point performance: 1,126 gflops vs 46 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 275
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1527 vs 524
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8941 vs 2143
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3157 vs 1381
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3157 vs 1381
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3044
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 3 September 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops vs 46 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 275 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 vs 524 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 vs 2143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3044 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 275 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 | 524 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | 2143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Vega | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 3 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 1421 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 46 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,500 million | 392 million |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |