AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 7.7x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
  • 25.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 20
  • 24.5x better floating-point performance: 1,126 gflops vs 46 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 20 Watt
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 275
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1527 vs 524
  • 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8941 vs 2143
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3157 vs 1381
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3157 vs 1381
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3044
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 24 November 2017 vs 3 September 2013
Texture fill rate 35.2 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 20
Floating-point performance 1,126 gflops vs 46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 20 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 399 vs 275
PassMark - G3D Mark 1527 vs 524
Geekbench - OpenCL 8941 vs 2143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3157 vs 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3157 vs 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3044

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
399
275
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1527
524
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8941
2143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3157
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3157
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3044
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G2D Mark 399 275
PassMark - G3D Mark 1527 524
Geekbench - OpenCL 8941 2143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3157 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3157 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 817
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 152

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile Intel HD Graphics 4400

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Generation 7.5
Code name Vega Haswell GT2
Launch date 24 November 2017 3 September 2013
Place in performance rating 665 1421
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,126 gflops 46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 512 20
Texture fill rate 35.2 GTexel / s 4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 4,500 million 392 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz
Memory type DDR4
Shared memory 1

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.3

Technologies

Quick Sync