AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
3.4x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
12.8x more pipelines: 512 vs 40
10.8x better floating-point performance: 1,126 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 30 Watt
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1487 vs 1191
Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8941 vs 5081

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 November 2017 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	35.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 40
Floating-point performance	1,126 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1487 vs 1191
Geekbench - OpenCL	8941 vs 5081

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 391
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 3157
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 3157

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	399 vs 391
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3285 vs 3157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3285 vs 3157

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

391

399

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1487

1191

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8941

5081

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3157

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3157

3285

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G2D Mark	391	399
PassMark - G3D Mark	1487	1191
Geekbench - OpenCL	8941	5081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3157	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3157	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2095

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Vega	Haswell GT3e
Launch date	24 November 2017	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	664	644
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1300 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,126 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	512	40
Texture fill rate	35.2 GTexel / s	10.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	4,500 million	392 million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz
Memory type	DDR4	eDRAM
Shared memory		1
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		No outputs
API support
DirectX		12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL		4.3
Technologies
Quick Sync