AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 8.8x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 399
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 1527
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 8941
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3157
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 399 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 1527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 8941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 457 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 | 5029 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | 17466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3360 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega | GP107 |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 586 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 1,862 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,500 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 2-slot | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |