AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 and NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 11 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 | NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1429 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1899 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6270 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3079 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3079 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1692 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1692 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3011 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3011 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 | NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega | Maxwell |
| Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GM108 |
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 949 | 950 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1041 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 799.5 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 16.66 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |

