AMD Radeon RX Vega vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 11823
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 687
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 vs 40088
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3354
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2017 vs 5 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 307.2 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 vs 11823 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 vs 687 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68096 vs 40088 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 2094
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2391
- 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 2094
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2391
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2391 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 | 11823 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 | 687 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68096 | 40088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.999 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2094 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2391 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2094 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2391 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Greenland | GM200 |
Launch date | 1 April 2017 | 5 March 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599.99 | $4,999 |
Place in performance rating | 244 | 245 |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 988 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 307.2 GTexel / s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB / s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan |