AMD Radeon RX Vega vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 988 MHz
  • Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1114 MHz
  • Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
  • Around 44% better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 11823
  • Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 687
  • Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 vs 40088
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3354
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3354
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 April 2017 vs 5 March 2016
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 988 MHz
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate 307.2 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 4096 vs 3072
Floating-point performance 9,830 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 12297 vs 11823
PassMark - G2D Mark 882 vs 687
Geekbench - OpenCL 68096 vs 40088
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8455 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8455 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

  • 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 2094
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2391
  • 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 2094
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2391
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13107 vs 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13107 vs 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 2391

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12297
11823
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
882
687
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
68096
40088
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2094
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2391
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8455
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2094
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2391
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8455
3354
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark 12297 11823
PassMark - G2D Mark 882 687
Geekbench - OpenCL 68096 40088
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 205.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3986.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 17.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1291.445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2094 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2391 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8455 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2094 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2391 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8455 3354

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.3 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Greenland GM200
Launch date 1 April 2017 5 March 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $599.99 $4,999
Place in performance rating 244 245
Price now $409.99
Type Desktop Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 38.94

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 988 MHz
Floating-point performance 9,830 gflops 6,844 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 4096 3072
Texture fill rate 307.2 GTexel / s 285.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 8,000 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB / s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 6612 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6
Vulkan