AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon Pro 5700

AMD Radeon RX Vega

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1200 MHz
632.8x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 225 Watt
8.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 2094
8.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 2094
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2391
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2391

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 Aug 2020 vs 1 April 2017
Core clock speed	1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Texture fill rate	194.4 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18549 vs 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18549 vs 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 2391

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 vs 52740
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3359
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3359

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	4096 vs 2304
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	68096 vs 52740
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8455 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8455 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

52740

68096

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18549

2094

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18549

2094

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

2391

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

2391

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

8455

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

8455

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5700	AMD Radeon RX Vega
Geekbench - OpenCL	52740	68096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18549	2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18549	2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	2391
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	8455
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	8455
PassMark - G3D Mark		12297
PassMark - G2D Mark		882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		205.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3986.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		17.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		215.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1291.445

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5700	AMD Radeon RX Vega
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 1.3
Code name	Navi 10	Greenland
Launch date	4 Aug 2020	1 April 2017
Place in performance rating	246	243
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$599.99
Price now		$409.99
Value for money (0-100)		38.94
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1200 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.44 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.221 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	4096
Pixel fill rate	86.40 GPixel/s
Render output units	64
Texture fill rate	194.4 GTexel/s	307.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million
Floating-point performance		9,830 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	512 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2