AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs AMD Radeon E8860
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and AMD Radeon E8860 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 625 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 37 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2591 vs 1246
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2591 vs 1246
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1856 vs 1655
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1856 vs 1655
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 25 January 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 37 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 vs 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 vs 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 vs 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 vs 1655 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 640 vs 576
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 409
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 vs 1591
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 vs 9870
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 2482
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 2482
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 576 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 vs 409 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1686 vs 1591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26300 vs 9870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4345 vs 2482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4345 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8860
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | AMD Radeon E8860 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 436 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 1686 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 | 26300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 4345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 4345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 529.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.86 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 9 | AMD Radeon E8860 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Venus |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 25 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 812 | 1021 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 37 Watt |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 1,500 million |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |