AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2591 vs 2524
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2591 vs 2524
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 vs 2524 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 409
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 1591
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14535 vs 9870
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 1856
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 1856
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2482
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2482
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 26 Oct 2017 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 409 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 vs 1591 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 vs 9870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 1856 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 1856 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 444 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 2428 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 | 14535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 9 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega | Polaris |
| Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Lexa |
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 811 | 812 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4500 million | 2200 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | Half Height | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 9 with others
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
