ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI FireMV 2200
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V8800 and ATI FireMV 2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 324 MHz
- 50.9x more texture fill rate: 66.0 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 11.7x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 392 MHz
- 63.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2281 vs 36
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 April 2010 vs 1 January 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 324 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 392 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2281 vs 36 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 259 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200
- 13.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 208 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 208 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V8800
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | ATI FirePro V8800 | ATI FireMV 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2281 | 36 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 | 259 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36751 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.27 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1180.667 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.357 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.357 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 228.843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI FirePro V8800 | ATI FireMV 2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rage 9 |
| Code name | Cypress | RV370 |
| Launch date | 7 April 2010 | 1 January 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Place in performance rating | 693 | 695 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 324 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 1600 | |
| Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s | 1.296 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 208 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB / s | 3.136 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 392 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
