NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs ATI FirePro V8800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 7000 and ATI FirePro V8800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 208 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3505 vs 2281
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.699 vs 18.27
- 10.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 vs 0.357
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.693 vs 49.357
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3575
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 May 2012 vs 7 April 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt vs 208 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 vs 2281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 vs 18.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 vs 0.357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 vs 49.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3575 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 651 MHz
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 66.0 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- 3.1x more pipelines: 1600 vs 512
- Around 98% better floating-point performance: 2,640.0 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 3404 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 397
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1180.667 vs 1142.156
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 228.843 vs 110.277
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 651 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops vs 1,332 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 3404 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1180.667 vs 1142.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 228.843 vs 110.277 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | ATI FirePro V8800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 | 2281 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 | 445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 | 18.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 | 1180.667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 | 0.357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 | 49.357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 | 228.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36751 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | ATI FirePro V8800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF110 | Cypress |
Launch date | 2 May 2012 | 7 April 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 709 | 711 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 GTexel / s | 66.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | 208 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |