ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Memory, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 vs 68
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 August 2010 vs 23 December 2008 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 vs 68 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 918
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 918
- 13.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1501 vs 111
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 918 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1501 vs 111 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 918 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 918 | 3347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 | 68 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 111 | 1501 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RV6xx | Tesla 2.0 |
Launch date | 1 August 2010 | 23 December 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1189 | 1191 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Code name | GT200B | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
Price now | $179.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.17 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 159.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1476 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 708.5 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |