NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 8.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 936 vs 111
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 918
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 918
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 1 August 2010 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 936 vs 111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 918 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 vs 164
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 vs 164 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 936 | 111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 | 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.493 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.42 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.863 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.242 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 918 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | RV6xx |
Code name | GK107 | |
Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 1 August 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1187 | 1189 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |