ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 260 vs 175
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 September 2009 vs 1 November 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 260 vs 175 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 462 vs 91
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2485 vs 511
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2485 vs 511
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 498 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 vs 91 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2485 vs 511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2485 vs 511 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 91 | 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 260 | 175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 511 | 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 511 | 2485 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
| Code name | RS880 | G92 |
| Launch date | 10 September 2009 | 1 November 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1145 | 1146 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 498 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Transistor count | 181 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 96 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP with others
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 Pro
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9000 IGP
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTX
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
