ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 vs ATI FirePro V8700
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 and ATI FirePro V8700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Launch date | 9 January 2009 vs 11 September 2008 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8700
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 8.3x more texture fill rate: 30 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 800 vs 80
- 16.7x better floating-point performance: 1,200.0 gflops vs 72 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 10.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1539 vs 148
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops vs 72 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1539 vs 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | ATI FirePro V8700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | 1539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 | 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8543 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 152.6 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | ATI FirePro V8700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
Code name | M92 | RV770 |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 | 11 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 430 | 433 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 3.6 GTexel / s | 30 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 242 million | 956 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 3400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |