ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 and ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 290 vs 156
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 January 2010 vs 10 September 2008 |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 290 vs 156 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 320 vs 80
- 4.4x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 88 gflops
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 208 vs 191
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 88 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 208 vs 191 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 191 | 208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 290 | 156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
Code name | M92 | RV730 |
Launch date | 1 January 2010 | 10 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1049 | 1051 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 88 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 242 million | 514 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 48 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | AGP 8x |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |