NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 18.3x more texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 16.8x more pipelines: 1344 vs 80
- 23.2x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 88 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 17x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3252 vs 191
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 290
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3111 vs 782
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3111 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 June 2012 vs 1 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion / sec vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops vs 88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3252 vs 191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 vs 290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3111 vs 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3111 vs 782 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3252 | 191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 | 290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9400 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3111 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3111 | 782 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | M92 |
Launch date | 4 June 2012 | 1 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
Place in performance rating | 1048 | 1051 |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | 88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion / sec | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |