NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 192 vs 80
- 7.9x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 88 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 8.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1554 vs 191
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 290
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 782
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 March 2011 vs 1 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1554 vs 191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1026 MHz
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1026 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1554 | 191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 782 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF116 | M92 |
Launch date | 15 March 2011 | 1 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 1046 | 1049 |
Price now | $287.59 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |