ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8.3x more texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 110 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 10.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 866 vs 81
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 472 vs 294
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 vs 9 August 2004 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 866 vs 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 vs 294 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 866 | 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 | 294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2486 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2486 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Curie |
Code name | M98 | NV43 A2 |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 | 9 August 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 549 | 550 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 800 | |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 956 million | 146 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |