ATI Radeon 3100 IGP vs Intel GMA 500
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon 3100 IGP and Intel GMA 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 344 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
Core clock speed | 344 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
GPU 2: Intel GMA 500
Name | ATI Radeon 3100 IGP | Intel GMA 500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 74 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 370 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 370 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon 3100 IGP | Intel GMA 500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | PowerVR SGX535 |
Code name | RS780 | Poulsbo |
Launch date | 4 March 2008 | 2 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1272 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 344 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Transistor count | 180 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | ES 2.0 |