NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M vs ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M and ATI Radeon 3100 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 344 MHz
- 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 74
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1876 vs 370
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1876 vs 370
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 4 March 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 344 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 vs 74 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1876 vs 370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1876 vs 370 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 228 vs 153
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 vs 153 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | ATI Radeon 3100 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 | 74 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 | 228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1876 | 370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1876 | 370 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | ATI Radeon 3100 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | RS780 |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 4 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1263 | 1265 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz | 344 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 562 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-IV | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |