ATI Radeon 3100 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon 3100 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 228 vs 98
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 March 2008 vs 8 November 2006 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 vs 98 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 576 MHz vs 344 MHz
- 8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 590 vs 74
- 9.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 370
- 9.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 370
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz vs 344 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 590 vs 74 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 370 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon 3100 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 74 | 590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | 98 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 370 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 370 | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon 3100 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RS780 | G80 |
Launch date | 4 March 2008 | 8 November 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1265 | 1266 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 344 MHz | 576 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Transistor count | 180 million | 681 million |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 155 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 270 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
SLI |