ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP vs Intel GMA 500
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP and Intel GMA 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 494 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
| Core clock speed | 494 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP | Intel GMA 500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale | PowerVR SGX535 |
| Code name | RS780 | Poulsbo |
| Launch date | 4 March 2008 | 2 March 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 494 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Transistor count | 180 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | ES 2.0 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP with others
ATIRadeon HD 3200 IGP vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
ATIRadeon HD 3200 IGP vs
IntelGMA 500
ATIRadeon HD 3200 IGP vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 2100 IGP
