ATI Radeon HD 3690 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 3690 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3690
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 2x 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 197 Watt
- Around 66% higher memory clock speed: 1660 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Pipelines | 320 vs 2x 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 197 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1660 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 670 MHz
- 7.2x more texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 10.72 GTexel / s
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 2x 384.0 gflops vs 428.8 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 512 MB vs 256 MB
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 670 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.8 billion / sec vs 10.72 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2x 384.0 gflops vs 428.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 3690
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Name | ATI Radeon HD 3690 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3238 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3238 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 3690 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RV670 | G92 |
Launch date | 30 March 2008 | 18 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 488 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 428.8 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 2x 128 |
Texture fill rate | 10.72 GTexel / s | 76.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 197 Watt |
Transistor count | 666 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 26.56 GB / s | 128 (64 per GPU) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1660 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |