ATI Radeon HD 3690 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 3690 and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3690
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 10.72 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 320 vs 32
- 5.4x better floating-point performance: 428.8 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1660 MHz vs 800 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 10.72 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 428.8 gflops vs 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1660 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 670 MHz
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 670 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 3690
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 3690 | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 270 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 3690 | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
| Code name | RV670 | G84 |
| Launch date | 30 March 2008 | 13 March 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 507 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 428.8 gflops | 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.72 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Transistor count | 666 million | 289 million |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 26.56 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1660 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2?, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |