ATI Radeon HD 4520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4520 and NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4520
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 589 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 4.8 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 96 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 31 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 666 MHz
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 589 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 80 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 96 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 31 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 666 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 4520 | NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 143 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2724 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1052 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1052 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 4520 | NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | RV710 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 2 December 2009 | 27 November 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1654 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 589 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | 44.86 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 4.71 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Transistor count | 242 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 5.33 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 666 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | DDR2 |