ATI Radeon HD 4520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4520 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4520
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- 6x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
- 3x better floating-point performance: 288 gflops vs 96 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 288 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4520 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 415 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4520 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RV710 | G92 |
Launch date | 2 December 2009 | 1 December 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1262 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $49.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | 288 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 242 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |