ATI Radeon HD 4860 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4860 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4860
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 240
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 896.0 gflops vs 673.9 gflops
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1134 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3195
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3195
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 September 2009 vs 15 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 896.0 gflops vs 673.9 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1134 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3195 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- 2x more core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 22.4 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher maximum memory size: 896 MB vs 512 MB
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 22.4 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 896 MB vs 512 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4860
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 4860 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3195 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1378 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 63 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 4860 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | RV790 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 9 September 2009 | 15 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1224 | 1225 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 896.0 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s | 50.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 959 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 896 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | 127.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 1134 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
