ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5450 and NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 33.7x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 640 Watt
| Launch date | 4 February 2010 vs 25 July 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 640 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
- 83.1x more texture fill rate: 4x 32.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 4x 128 vs 80
- 12.3x better floating-point performance: 4x 320.0 gflops vs 104 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4x 1 GB vs 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 4x 32.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4x 128 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 320.0 gflops vs 104 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4x 1 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5450 | NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Cedar | G92 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 4 February 2010 | 25 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1606 | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 4x 320.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 4x 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 4x 32.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 640 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 522 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4x 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 4x 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 4x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||

