ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5450 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 80 vs 32
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 60.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 136 vs 134
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 140 vs 59
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1457 vs 1053
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1457 vs 1053
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 February 2010 vs 1 February 2008 |
| Pipelines | 80 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 60.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 vs 134 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 vs 59 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 vs 1053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 vs 1053 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 | 134 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | 59 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 | 1053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 | 1053 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5450 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Cedar | G84 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 4 February 2010 | 1 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1606 | 1608 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 60.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 7.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 289 million |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||

