Apple M1 7-core vs ATI Radeon X1900 GT
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 7-core and ATI Radeon X1900 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 7-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1278 MHz vs 575 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 90 nm
- 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 vs 1 May 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 7-core
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1900 GT
Name | Apple M1 7-core | ATI Radeon X1900 GT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18993 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 146 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M1 7-core | ATI Radeon X1900 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 | 1 May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 419 | 416 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Architecture | R500 | |
Code name | R580 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 590 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4750 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.290 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 7 | |
Render output units | 28 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 75 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 6.9 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 384 million | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 66.67 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | |
OpenGL | 2.0 |