Apple M1 7-core vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 7-core and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 7-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1278 MHz vs 837 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 28 nm
- 17.9x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10433 vs 10176
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10433 vs 10176
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 vs 19 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz vs 837 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 vs 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 vs 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- 384x more pipelines: 2688 vs 7
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24530 vs 18993
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 7 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24530 vs 18993 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 7-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Apple M1 7-core | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18993 | 24530 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8194 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple M1 7-core | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 | 19 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 419 | 422 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | Kepler | |
| Code name | GK110 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 590 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4750 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.290 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 7 | 2688 |
| Render output units | 28 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec | |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 66.67 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Apple M1 7-core with others
AppleM1 7-core vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AppleM1 7-core vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AppleM1 7-core vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDRadeon HD 7990
AppleM1 7-core vs
AppleM1 8-core
