Apple M1 8-core vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 8-core and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 8-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1278 MHz vs 550 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 21 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 128 MB
Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 vs 20 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 21 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 128 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 8-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Name | Apple M1 8-core | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18824 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 86 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M1 8-core | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 | 20 April 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 424 | 422 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Architecture | Curie | |
Code name | G72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5200 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.617 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 21 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 2.2 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 112 million | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 66.67 GB/s | 6.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | DDR2 |
Memory clock speed | 810 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | |
OpenGL | 2.1 |