Apple M1 8-core vs AMD Radeon Pro 570
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 8-core and AMD Radeon Pro 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 8-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1278 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 14 nm
- 12x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10433 vs 7664
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10433 vs 7664
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 2340
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 2340
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 vs 5 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 vs 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 vs 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- 224x more pipelines: 1792 vs 8
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30250 vs 18918
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 8 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30250 vs 18918 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 8-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 570
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Apple M1 8-core | AMD Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18918 | 30250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple M1 8-core | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 | 5 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 429 | 432 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5200 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.617 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8 | 1792 |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 66.67 GB/s | 217.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Apple M1 8-core with others
AppleM1 8-core vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
AppleM1 8-core vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570
AppleM1 8-core vs
AMDRadeon Pro V340 MxGPU
AppleM1 8-core vs
AppleM1 7-core
AppleM1 8-core vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X
AppleM1 8-core vs
IntelArc A550M
