Apple M2 Pro 16-core vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550
Comparative analysis of Apple M2 Pro 16-core and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M2 Pro 16-core
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1398 MHz vs 1065 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47779 vs 34238
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1398 MHz vs 1065 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47779 vs 34238 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 64x more pipelines: 1024 vs 16
Launch date | 2022 vs 17 Jan 2023 |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 16 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M2 Pro 16-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Apple M2 Pro 16-core | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47779 | 34238 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1017.021 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M2 Pro 16-core | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 17 Jan 2023 | 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 453 | 456 |
Architecture | Turing | |
Code name | TU117 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1398 MHz | 1065 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.726 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 16 | 1024 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 42.24 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Pixel fill rate | 21.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 96.00 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 bit |
Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan |