Apple M2 Pro 16-core vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Apple M2 Pro 16-core and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M2 Pro 16-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1398 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47850 vs 36290
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 Jan 2023 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1398 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47850 vs 36290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- 56x more pipelines: 896 vs 16
| Pipelines | 896 vs 16 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M2 Pro 16-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Apple M2 Pro 16-core | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47850 | 36290 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6222 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.465 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.553 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.529 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple M2 Pro 16-core | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 17 Jan 2023 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 446 | 447 |
| Architecture | Turing | |
| Code name | TU117 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1398 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.726 TFLOPS | 2.231 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 16 | 896 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||

