Apple M2 Ultra 60-core vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of Apple M2 Ultra 60-core and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Apple M2 Ultra 60-core

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 119401 vs 74179

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1398 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Apple M2 Ultra 60-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1 GPU 2

119401 74179

Compare specifications (specs)