Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Comparative analysis of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 58 vs 31
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 vs 7 January 2010 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 vs 31 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 18x more pipelines: 72 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- 63.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 379 vs 6
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 72 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 379 vs 6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6 | 379 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 | 31 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | PowerVR SGX5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GMA 600 | GT215 |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1562 | 1564 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | 72 |
CUDA cores | 72 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 233 | |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | |
Transistor count | 727 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |