NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 48 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- 47.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 285 vs 6
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 75 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 1 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 285 vs 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 285 | 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 | 58 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1319 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.92 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | PowerVR SGX5 |
Code name | GF108 | GMA 600 |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 1 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1561 | 1562 |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |