Intel HD Graphics 2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 96.6x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 55 nm
- 14.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 32
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 213 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 29 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 32 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 213 vs 172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 32 vs 6
- 8.8x better floating-point performance: 89.6 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1039
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1039
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Pipelines | 32 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 89.6 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 vs 1039 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1039 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1039 | 1505 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | 32 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 213 | 172 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 2000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 6.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Sandy Bridge GT1 | G96C |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 718 | 1666 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
Price now | $85.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10.2 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 6 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 189 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 6.875" (17.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 / 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) | |
Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |