NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Intel HD Graphics 2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
448x more pipelines: 2688 vs 6
385.8x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
20.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4403 vs 213
6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 1039
6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 1039

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 November 2012 vs 5 January 2011
Pipelines	2688 vs 6
Floating-point performance	3,935 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4403 vs 213
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7038 vs 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7038 vs 1039

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

Around 16% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 732 MHz
5.2x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 164.0 GTexel / s
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 198

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 732 MHz
Texture fill rate	850 MTexel / s vs 164.0 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	456 vs 198

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4403

213

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

198

456

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7038

1039

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7038

1039

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm	Intel HD Graphics 2000
PassMark - G3D Mark	4403	213
PassMark - G2D Mark	198	456
Geekbench - OpenCL	16879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	49.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1666.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	92.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	275.229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7038	1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7038	1039

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm	Intel HD Graphics 2000
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 6.0
Code name	GK110	Sandy Bridge GT1
Launch date	12 November 2012	5 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$7,699
Place in performance rating	716	718
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	732 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,935 gflops	10.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Pipelines	2688	6
Texture fill rate	164.0 GTexel / s	850 MTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	235 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	189 million
Boost clock speed		1150 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	249.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory		1