NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 512x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 6
- 613.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 25.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5467 vs 213
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 456
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1673 vs 1039
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1673 vs 1039
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 May 2012 vs 5 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5467 vs 213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 456 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1673 vs 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1673 vs 1039 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1019 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 234 billion / sec
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1019 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 234 billion / sec |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5467 | 213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 | 456 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16577 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1673 | 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1673 | 1039 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 6.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Sandy Bridge GT1 |
| Launch date | 3 May 2012 | 5 January 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 717 | 718 |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1019 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 850 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | 10.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 6 |
| Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec | 850 MTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385
