Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6470M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 3000 and AMD Radeon HD 6470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 700 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 261 vs 226
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 261 vs 226 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6470M
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 5.6 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- 13.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 12
- 11x better floating-point performance: 224 gflops vs 20.4 gflops
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 105 vs 35
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1251 vs 1137
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1251 vs 1137
- 18.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1881 vs 101
- 18.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1881 vs 101
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 12 |
| Floating-point performance | 224 gflops vs 20.4 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 105 vs 35 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1251 vs 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1251 vs 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1881 vs 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1881 vs 101 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6470M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon HD 6470M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 261 | 226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 | 105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1137 | 1251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1137 | 1251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 101 | 1881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 101 | 1881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 729 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.282 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.819 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.276 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.671 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 589 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon HD 6470M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 6.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Sandy Bridge GT2 | Seymour |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 4 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1604 | 1579 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $569.99 | |
| Price now | $569.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 20.4 gflops | 224 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.7 GTexel / s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 995 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 3000 with others
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 405
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9400M G
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5450
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6310
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
