Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6310

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 3000 and AMD Radeon HD 6310 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 70% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 261 vs 122
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1137 vs 819
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1137 vs 819

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6310

• 6.7x more pipelines: 80 vs 12
• 13x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1311 vs 101
• 13x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1311 vs 101

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6310

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	261 122
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	35 35
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137 819
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137 819
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	101 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	101 1311

Compare specifications (specs)